## 1 2 No Limit Poker

That being said, these charts will serve you well in most typical low-stakes No-Limit cash games, such as games with blinds of \$1/\$2, and home games. These games typically have several loose players at the table, and good opportunities for winning big pots with suited connectors and pocket pairs.

This item: How to WIN at low stakes 1-2 No Limit Poker: Texas Holdem, Poker Techniques, Winning Strategies by Ace High Publishing Paperback \$7.64 Available to ship in 1-2 days. May 05, 2017 Thus, the nuances of live poker are certainly worth learning. Here are eight awesome live poker tips that will help you crush the games on your next trip to the casino (including two exclusive video tips from Doug Polk and Ryan Fee). This article has been updated (originally published 5/5/2017). Punish Limpers As Much As Possible. Oftentimes in a standard \$1/\$2 no-limit hold'em game, preflop raises are to an amount of \$10-\$15. Once in awhile, you'll have someone who makes an even larger raise size to \$20-\$25, but that is. Oftentimes in a standard \$1/\$2 no-limit hold'em game, preflop raises are to an amount of \$10-\$15. Once in awhile, you'll have someone who makes an even larger raise size to \$20-\$25, but that is.

Steve Selbrede

Preflop raising decisions can be very complex. What stakes are we playing? Is it a live game or online? How strong is our hand? Which limpers will call? Will we be in position postflop?

Sometimes our decision is obvious: 'I have aces, so I'm going to raise for value here.' Sometimes it's subjective: 'I think I can force the limper to fold here.' But we should also consider what a mathematical analysis of preflop raising can teach us. When is a raise our most profitable action for the moment? When might it be the most profitable action for the hand?

## Las Vegas \$1/\$2 NLH Stats

In order to calculate the expected value for our preflop actions accurately, we need to know certain key frequencies that are typical for our game.

Figure 1 below contains some of the most useful stats for these EV calculations for both online NL100 and \$1/\$2 NL live games in Las Vegas, most of them published here for the first time. (Check out Donkey Poker Volume 2: Postflop, Section 7.5 to see how these stats were generated.)

Here I define 'EP/MP' as the first four seats after the big blind on a nine-seat table. Since the vast majority of Vegas \$1/\$2 players are position-dumb, we can combine the results from these seats into a single stat in order to make the stat more reliable. The hijack and cutoff stats are similar to the EP/MP stats.

VPIP and PFR are the primary stats useful to determine an opponent's playing style. '35/6' means that the average Vegas player voluntarily invests in 35 percent of his dealt hands, while raising only 6 percent of them. This player would be considered a 'loose-passive' player in an online game, but he is average in a Vegas \$1/\$2 game.

Calling a Preflop Raise (CPFR) is a statistic that applies only when a player calls a raise after having already invested in the pot, which applies to limp-callers as well as to the blinds. This is not the same thing as Cold Calling Preflop (CCPF).

Compared to an online game, a Vegas preflop raise is fraught with more risk. Not only is our average raise size larger, our Vegas opponents are more likely to call it. Although their calling range is weaker, we often face multiple callers, which is rare online. Consequently, it is extremely important to have a solid idea of how these stats influence the profitability of our preflop action.

## A Simple Example: A Big Blind Hero vs. a Single EP/MP Limper

Let's consider a situation which is relatively easy to calculate. Suppose an average player limps from one of the EP/MP positions. It folds around to Hero in the big blind who can check his option or raise.

Figure 1 indicates that that Mr. Average has a range of 35 percent, but he normally raises with 6.1 percent of this range. So we can assign his limping range as [6.1–35]. The specific card combos within his range depend on the ranking system we use. Although there is no single ranking system that is always correct, I will use the Flopzilla NLHE ranking in this column, since it is easy for anyone to access.

Suppose Hero has and decides to check. We can estimate Hero's 'Momentary Expected Value' (MEV) as..

#### MEVCheck = Pot0 × EWC = \$5 × 0.474 = \$2.37

..where Pot0 = \$5 and EWC (Showdown Equity When Called) is 47.4 percent for Hero's pocket deuces when facing Villain's range. I call this his 'momentary' EV since it applies only at the moment he checks.

Suppose Hero decides to raise to \$10 with the same . Figure 1 shows that an average villain will call a preflop raise after limping in EP/MP about 56 percent of the time (Row 8). This would be a Flopzilla range of [6.1–22.7].

Hero's Fold Equity is FE = (1 - 0.564) = 0.436. His showdown Equity-When-Called is EWC = 0.454. Notice that even though the villain has folded nearly half of his range, Hero's EWC is only slightly worse than when he checks. This suggests that the villain's actual limping and calling ranges are not critical in establishing Hero's MEV.

After deciding to raise, we can calculate Hero's MEV as..

#### MEVRaise-\$8 = (FE × Pot0) + ((1-FE) × (EWC × Pot1 - Raise)) = \$2.27 + \$0.28 = \$2.55

The first term is just the average amount earned when the villain folds. The second term is the amount earned when the villain calls. ' Pot1' is the size of the pot after he calls, minus the rake. 'Raise' is the size of our raise (\$8 in this case). Since three-betting is so rare in Vegas \$1/\$2, and limp-three-betting is even rarer, we can ignore it for this calculation. Again, we consider this our momentary EV since it only applies at the end of the preflop action.

So Hero's raise appears to be more profitable (by \$0.18) than checking. It gains nearly all of its profitability from fold equity and a just little from showdown equity. This is generally the case for heads-up battles.

However, there is a serious issue with these estimates. MEV uses showdown equity, which essentially assumes that the hand will be checked down postflop. This rarely happens in a real game, which makes its usefulness imperfect. We haven't considered such factors as skill and position, which can increase or decrease our expected profit in the hand. Hero's inferior position in this scenario suggests that his actual 'Hand EV' (HEV) will be lower than his calculated MEV. Even Hero's superior skill will not likely overcome his inferior position.

Since Hero's inferior postflop position makes it difficult to realize the full MEV of either action, it's difficult to say which action would have the higher HEV. Hero's best decision could depend on whether the villain appears more or less likely than the average villain to fold to Hero's raise. We might also consider that if both actions result in a similar HEV, the check does so with less risk.

Figure 2 shows the results of these calculations applied to some of the hands listed in the Donkey Poker starting hands chart. The solid symbols represent Hero's MEV when raising to \$10, which is positive for each of these combos. 'JTs-' denotes 'suited connectors JTs and smaller.' Meanwhile the '+' symbols represent the difference in MEV between raising and checking.

When MEV is positive, raising is more profitable than checking, which is true for a range including approximately 22+, A2+, KT+, and QJ (i.e., any pocket pair, any ace-x hand, any two Broadway cards). This represents 27.6 percent of all starting hands.

Since we are out of position in the scenario, our HEV is probably lower than these values, so checking is probably preferable when the Delta MEV is close to zero.

## Button Hero vs. One Limper

The previous scenario is rare in Vegas \$1/\$2 games, but it serves to illustrate the principals used for our analytical EV calculations. A more common and useful example is when the Hero is on the button with and facing a single EP/MP limper. In this case Hero can fold, limp, or raise, where folding has an EVfold = 0.

This calculation has additional complexity because we have the blinds behind us, which means we must consider their propensity to check behind or complete and their propensity to call a raise. (We will ignore their negligible three-betting frequency here.)

Suppose Hero limps and the two blinds raise 4.8 percent and 3.4 percent of the time, respectively. If the small blind completes with [4.8-50] and the big blind has a range of [3.4-100], we will have a four-way pot about 92 percent of the time.

Let's suppose the other 8 percent of the time Hero limp-folds after one of the blinds raises. (This is plausible for those hands with which Hero would actually limp.) We can also assume that the EP/MP limper has a range of [6.1-35.7]. All of these values are based on the actual Vegas stats listed in Figure 1.

We then have..

#### MEVLimp = 0.92 × (Pot0 × EWC-Limp) - (0.08 × Limp) = 0.92 × (\$8 × 0.222 - \$2) - (0.08 × \$2) = -\$0.38

In other words, limping on the button with is not immediately profitable.

Suppose we raise to \$10 with on the button. Using the above frequencies, everyone will fold 23.1 percent of the time. A single villain will call 47.0 percent of the time, two villains will call 25.7 percent of the time, and everyone will call 4.2 percent of the time.

It turns out our EWC is nearly the same no matter which villain calls, so we can treat each villain as interchangeable. Thus, Hero's MEV is approximately..

#### MEVRaise = (0.231 × Pot0) + (0.47 × (EWC1 × Pot1 - Raise)) + (0.257 × (EWC2 × Pot2 - Raise)) + (0.042 × (EWC3 × Pot3 - Raise)) = \$0.63

..where the various values depend on how many players called our raise. We can see that raising with our pocket deuces is much more immediately profitable than limping with them. Furthermore, our Hand EV should be better than this since we have superior position and skill and since we can leverage our profit when we flop a set.

Note that when the blinds are tight and/or passive, they are less likely to call our raise and less likely to three-bet. (Pre-loading tells are very important here.) In these situations, raising a single limper from the button is even more +MEV. And our HEV is even more enhanced since we are less likely to face multiple villains in a raised pot. (It's generally easier to outplay a single villain than three of them.)

Figure 3 depicts the MEV results for various hand types. The symbols represent the MEV for raising to \$10 in a Vegas \$1/\$2 game. Each series represents a descending hand grouping. For example, 'T9s-' denotes 'suited connectors T9s and smaller.'

Bottom line: in low-stakes cash games such as the \$1/\$2 NL games in Vegas, raising is nearly always more profitable than limping (except for 63s, 53s, 65o and 54o). In fact, 33 percent of all starting combos are immediately profitable. And some of the negative-MEV combos are probably profitable for the hand due to our superior position.

Since most Vegas \$1/\$2 players are position-dumb, they generally limp and call with a similar frequency from the hijack and cutoff positions. So our very wide button raising range is valid for any single-limper situation when we are on the button.

## Button Hero vs. Multiple Limpers

The previous single-limper scenario occurs only a small fraction of the time in Vegas \$1/\$2 games. We can readily extend this to multiple-limper scenarios, which are much more common. This calculation is even more complex and we are less likely to fold everyone out with a \$10 button raise. This time I will spare you the gory math and show you the results below in Figure 4.

Here the top four curves represent the MEV for raising to \$10 facing one, two, three, and four limpers. The smooth line represents the average MEV of limping. These curves show that our 'immediately profitable' raising range is 33.6 percent when facing a single limper, and that our range decreases to 13.4 percent when facing four limpers.

We can make several conclusions here:

### 1 2 No Limit Poker Tips

• The more limpers we face, the tighter our raising range should be from the button.
• When facing one or two limpers, we should generally either raise or fold, since once raising becomes unprofitable, limping is even more unprofitable.
• When facing three or more limpers, limping is generally more profitable than raising once raising becomes unprofitable. So we now have both raising and limping ranges.
• When both raising and limping have MEVs near zero, limping may be preferable since we risk less for the same reward.
• Our slightly negative-MEV combos may still have slightly positive-EV for the hand. Our superior skill and position, coupled with our ability to leverage our big flops should increase our profit for the hand. This is combo-dependent since some combos are more likely to flop big. (22 is stronger than 54o.)
• Another way to state this is that some -MEV combos may have sufficient implied odds play. For instance, we can play a -\$0.50 MEV combo if we believe our implied EV for the hand is worth more than this.

## The Effect of Raise Size

A typical rule of thumb for these Vegas \$1/\$2 games is to raise to about 4x BB plus one additional BB for each limper. Thus we would raise to \$10, \$12, \$14, or \$16 as the number of limpers increases. The previous analysis kept the raise size constant to see the influence of the number of limpers.

A key question we would like answered is how the villains will respond to reasonable variations in raise size. Unfortunately, that data does not exist for these Vegas games. My general feeling, however, is that most Vegas \$1/\$2 players are not very sensitive to our raise size as long as we keep it within the table norm. So, to a first approximation, we can assume that the Figure 1 stats do not change very much when we increase our raise size incrementally.

Figure 5 shows what happens to MEVRaise as we increase the size of our raise when facing four limpers. We can see that that our raising range decreases slightly as we increase our raise size. This effect is fairly small and may be counterbalanced by a decreased likelihood that a villain will call a larger raise.

Bet365 no deposit bonus code 2018 download. Here the symbols represent the MEV for raising to \$10, \$12, \$14 or \$16 in a Vegas \$1/\$2 game. These combos are sorted in order of MEVRaise.

The important thing to notice in this graph is that we have a much larger MEV when we raise our best hands by the maximum amount that will not result in a villain adjustment. If we have aces and the villains will call a \$16 bet as often as a \$10 bet, we should bet \$16.

On the other hand, we should consider betting smaller with our borderline raising hands. Of course, this sets up the possibility that we could be telegraphing our hand strength. But most Vegas \$1/\$2 players are not paying much attention to our bet size unless the size is unusual for the table. Here we can make adjustments based on our knowledge of the players at our table.

## Hero is in the Cutoff

Putting the Hero in the cutoff makes the analysis even more complex. Making some reasonable approximations, I can make a few generalizations:

• All players, including the button, are very unlikely to three-bet, so we should generally ignore this possibility when deciding to raise. (If our particular button opponent likes to three-bet, we should consider changing seats.)
• The button is less likely to cold call our cutoff raise than an EP/MP player is to call after a limp.
• Being in the cutoff facing three limpers is similar to being on the button facing four limpers. This is equivalent to the button replacing the fourth limper.
• The average button will call our cutoff raise about 22 percent of the time. We will then not have a postflop position advantage on every villain. This means that our average HEV will not be as enhanced from the cutoff as it would be from the button, and thus our cutoff raising range should be somewhat tighter that it would be from the button with one additional limper.
• If we have a tell that suggests that the button intends to fold, we can play the cutoff exactly as we would normally play the button.

## Conclusions

We can't yet decide on a specific hand range for each scenario since we have not yet determined just how valuable our superior position and skill is. Nevertheless, it is clear that the more limpers we face, the tighter our raising raise should be.

Also, our raising range should be much wider than the typical Vegas player. We can also play from the cutoff facing X limpers with a similar range as from the button when facing X+1 limpers.

And of course, we should always adjust our ranges depending on the tendencies of the specific villains we face and based on specific tells we observe.

Steve Selbrede has been playing poker for 20 years and writing about it since 2012. He is the author of five books, The Statistics of Poker, Beat the Donks, Donkey Poker Volume 1: Preflop, Donkey Poker Volume 2: Postflop, and Donkey Poker Volume 3: Hand Reading.

• ### Tags

cash game strategyno-limit hold’empreflop strategystarting hand selectionpositionbet sizingpot oddslive pokertells
clarkacal
Sometimes you are in a tough spot and can only recognize an error in judgement when play is over and you see everyone's cards. I do think a better way to play this hand would have been bet half the pot on the flop, even though it gives a flush draw theoretical proper odds to call. They might be getting 3 to 1 but the chances of the turn being a heart are at best a little over 4:1. When no heart hits the turn, bet the pot and price him out of a draw and take the pot down. Since in this case he already had the flush on the flop there is a good chance he would have check raised your flop bet and you would know what you are dealing with. If he would have checked called your flop and river bet he was just patient and outplayed you, not much you can do. A big mistake was making a bet only to scare people off, not intending to get called. The majority of the time the only call you get will beat you and the other times you won't get called, so a very -ev bet.
WizardofEngland

Sometimes you are in a tough spot and can only recognize an error in judgement when play is over and you see everyone's cards. I do think a better way to play this hand would have been bet half the pot on the flop, even though it gives a flush draw theoretical proper odds to call. They might be getting 3 to 1 but the chances of the turn being a heart are at best a little over 4:1. When no heart hits the turn, bet the pot and price him out of a draw and take the pot down. Since in this case he already had the flush on the flop there is a good chance he would have check raised your flop bet and you would know what you are dealing with. If he would have checked called your flop and river bet he was just patient and outplayed you, not much you can do. A big mistake was making a bet only to scare people off, not intending to get called. The majority of the time the only call you get will beat you and the other times you won't get called, so a very -ev bet.

I think a bet on the flop has value to. A raise would at least signal a big draw. It has to be an awful flop for 7's though. The king high flush should be looking to price out a potential nut flush draw for someone holding the ace of hearts. He might of thought you had the ace of hearts.
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
duckston09
I was playing for about 20 minutes to a half hour when this hand occurred. I started with \$200.00 and had about \$170.00 or \$180.00 in my stack. I had pocket 7's and made the bet \$15.00. Three people behind me folded, putting me in last position. It was to early to know the tight players and loose players. What surprised me was, when it came my turn, I was really confused because I always play fix limit. Watching on television is a lot different than playing live. (i was playing in a casino).That's why I went a long with the check after the flop (whether I was right or wrong) because I needed time to think.
duckston09
Clarkocal, I agree with you. I should have felt him out a little bit, in terms of a smaller bet. There was no reason to lose all my money in that pot. Remember, he dosen't want to lose me, so he would have made maybe \$60.00 to \$100.00 of me.
DJTeddyBear

..because I needed time to think.

Then you should have taken the time to think.
There's no time limit. After a while, the dealer may remind you that it's your turn, because it does happen occasionally where the person doesn't realize the action is on him. Other than that, you can take however long you want, until another player calls for the clock. At that point, you have, usually, 60 seconds.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
duckston09
I just had a chance to read all the responses and I thank you all. Another thing that confused me was , when I went all in, he hesitated. There was no way he was going to fold the hand, but after he hesitated I thought the hand was mine. In fact his exact words were 'O.K., I call, then he stood up. After seeing my three sevens he was repeatedly saying , NO PAIR, NO PAIR. . i was just so baffled on the whole concept of the way the hand played out compared to fix limit.
P90

I just had a chance to read all the responses and I thank you all. Another thing that confused me was , when I went all in, he hesitated. There was no way he was going to fold the hand, but after he hesitated I thought the hand was mine.

I can't count all the times I stayed in with a full house - and lost. Despite that, only folded a FH in a live cash game once. His flush was beatable by an ace-high one, so he was right to take a moment to think. And then, again, right to decide to call.
Resist ANFO Boston PRISM Stormfront IRA Freedom CIA Obama
duckston09
DJTeddyBear, what happened was, when it came my turn after the flop, I did sit there and think a little bit. But it seemed the more I thought, the more confused I became (in fact, I was getting a little nervous). That's the reason I check on the flop. I forget who said it, but I suggest never getting in a no limit game unless you practice somewhere to get the full understanding of the game.
thecesspit
He hestitated as he was trying to think if you hand the ace-high flush, a draw to an ace high flush or a set/two-pair.

### How Many People Win At 1 2 No Limit Poker

Raising the 7's in middle position is probably a bit loose.. you'll be called by a lot of better hands, and you really need a 7 on the flop to continue with it. Any ace or face on the flop and your raise is called pre-flop and your making a hard decision if you don't make the set
A bet on the flop would have done wonders.. if he smooth calls you can continue the bet on the river. There your semi-bluffing.. you can be bluffing you have a flush, and drawing to the house. Course if he smooth calls the flop, he might have the nut flush already, and hoping you get a card that gets you in trouble (hence his check on the flop), so a continuation bet on the turn might also get called, but I would expect the ace-high flush to be raising at this point on the flop once he's seen action in front to make a weaker flush pay him off and to give the wrong price to anyone drawing to a full house.

### 1 2 No Limit Poker Las Vegas

If you get raised on the flop, you can get away from the hand. Same on the turn, a half to 3/4 pot bet you can fold to anything aggressive coming back at you.
Basically, a middle set on the flop wants to win the hand as soon as possible. A middle set on a 3 flush flop REALLY wants to win it as soon as possible. Try to win it there and if not walk away for much less than your stack.
'Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept, thought nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire for a coup at trente-et-quarante' - Honore de Balzac, 1829
DJTeddyBear

DJTeddyBear, what happened was, when it came my turn after the flop, I did sit there and think a little bit. But it seemed the more I thought, the more confused I became (in fact, I was getting a little nervous).

Understood.
Quote: duckston09

I forget who said it, but I suggest never getting in a no limit game unless you practice somewhere to get the full understanding of the game.

Well, I kinda said something similar.

### \$1 \$2 No Limit Poker Betting Format

Join a poker pub league.

### 1 2 No Limit Poker Strategy

I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁